fix(openclaw): verify the published npm Registry artifact - #283
Merged
Conversation
linfangw
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 30, 2026 07:39
Collaborator
|
@codex review |
vxwork
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2026
ax2
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
gitHeadopenclaw plugins install ... --pinin fresh isolated stateRoot cause
The publish workflow verified a locally packed tarball before
npm publish, then created the GitHub Release without exercising the artifact consumers receive from the npm Registry. A local source or tarball check could therefore pass while Registry propagation, provenance, package contents, or the official OpenClaw installation path was broken.Deep review also found three recovery/semantic gaps in the first implementation:
npm publishstep again;GITHUB_ENVcrossing jobs, which would have produced a GitHub Release with an empty version.Safety and recovery
contents: readplus OIDC; only the Release job receivescontents: writeValidation
@qverisai/qveris@2026.7.30with OpenClaw2026.7.1-2Closes #282