Skip to content

league/commonmark: Denial of service via duplicate footnote definitions

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 3, 2026 in thephpleague/commonmark • Updated Aug 6, 2026

Package

composer league/commonmark (Composer)

Affected versions

>= 1.5.0, < 2.9.0

Patched versions

2.9.0

Description

Impact

The Footnote extension records one backref per footnote reference and then appends the entire backref list for every footnote definition block in the document, without ever de-duplicating or removing repeated definitions of the same label (GatherFootnotesListener, populated by NumberFootnotesListener). A document that references a single label N times and also supplies N duplicate [^a]: definitions of that label therefore produces N × N FootnoteBackref nodes, so output size, parse time, and peak memory are all O(N²).

Reaching the vulnerable path requires FootnoteExtension to be registered on the Environment. This is opt-in, but is a commonly enabled GFM-style feature; no other non-default configuration is required. An unauthenticated attacker can expand a ~10 KB request into a ~62 MB HTML response, ~3 s of CPU, and ~440 MB of peak memory — enough to OOM-kill a default 128 MB PHP worker and deny service. Availability impact only; no confidentiality or integrity effect. The Footnote extension was introduced in 1.5.0 (May 2020) with this backref logic present from the first commit, so all releases from 1.5.0 onward (including every 2.x through 2.8.x) are affected.

Workarounds

There is no library-level option to cap the number of footnotes, references, or definitions, so no configuration switch prevents the amplification. Integrators who cannot upgrade should:

  • Disable the Footnote extension for untrusted input, or
  • Enforce a strict input-size limit before conversion — but note this is a weak control here, since the ~10 KB payload that already triggers the 62 MB / ~440 MB blowup is well within typical request-body limits, so any cap must be aggressively small to help.

Upgrading to the patched release is the recommended remediation.

References

@colinodell colinodell published to thephpleague/commonmark Aug 3, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 6, 2026
Reviewed Aug 6, 2026
Last updated Aug 6, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity

An algorithm in a product has an inefficient worst-case computational complexity that may be detrimental to system performance and can be triggered by an attacker, typically using crafted manipulations that ensure that the worst case is being reached. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-jfm3-95jq-q3rf

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.