-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
Ruby AST: preserve ExceptionList node in RescueClause for 2+ exceptions #22014
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
aschackmull
merged 5 commits into
main
from
copilot/update-rescue-clause-exception-handling
Jun 22, 2026
+1,676
−1,579
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0834e64
Ruby: Prepare qltest change by line renumbering.
aschackmull 65b4a43
Add ExceptionList AST node for rescue clauses with 2+ exceptions
Copilot 132b476
Ruby: autoformat
aschackmull 6fbb572
Ruby: Get rid of the change note.
aschackmull 7d66ec0
Ruby: Clarify AST.
aschackmull File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't it be cleaner to always synthesize this node? Then we can also simplify some logic AFAICT.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My thinking was that it would represent a disjunctive pattern. So when you get the pattern of the catch clause then it's either a single exception expression or a disjunctive pattern with multiple nested exception expressions. With that point of view, then I think it would be confusing to add singleton disjunctive patterns. But we should perhaps replace the
getExceptionsmember with agetPatternmember that always has a result to reinforce that view.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've pushed a tweak that should hopefully make the intent clearer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, that's much better.