feat(plan): 章纲加「章长方向」字段，Step 9 校它与节拍表一致 - #142
Open
PTAbabybearR wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
closes lingfengQAQ#141 问题：章纲必填字段里没有任何一个回答「本章该写多长」。 而 Step 4 的卷节拍表天然会排长短（长章不成簇、相邻反转是网文节奏的基本纪律）， 于是排布在节拍表、写手打开的是章纲，两者之间没有同步动作，也没有一致性检查。 实测：一个 80 章的卷，章纲里只有 3 章带方向标注，其余 77 章没有； 更早一轮曾给其中 4 章补过，后来章纲重做/合并时被冲掉，没有任何东西报错。 写手拿到没有长度判据的章纲，而 Step 9 因为「字段齐全」一路绿灯。 改动： - 必填字段加 `章长方向`（值域由项目自定，如 长/中/短）。 - 写明 Step 7 生成章纲时要把 Step 4 节拍表的排布落进这个字段，不要只留在节拍表里 —— 写手打开的是章纲，判据不在章纲里等于没有。 - 写明本字段只写档位方向、不写字数区间：区间属于项目自己的文风判据， 章纲里写指针即可，避免同一组数字散在多处、改一处漏一处。 - Step 9 增加两项：每章都有该字段；该字段与节拍表排布一致（不一致报章号，不自动改写）。 向后兼容：SKILL.md 只增不删；旧项目章纲缺该字段时该项跳过， 与既有「旧项目缺字段则跳过结构化检查」的条款一致。 与 lingfengQAQ#139/lingfengQAQ#140 同类：章纲缺一个字段，而「缺了」这件事本身无人发现。
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #141
见 #141 的问题描述与实测数据。
改动
章长方向（值域由项目自定，如 长/中/短）。向后兼容
SKILL.md只增不删；旧项目章纲缺该字段时该项跳过，与既有「旧项目缺字段则跳过结构化检查」的条款一致。与 #139 / #140 的关系
同一类病、不同字段：章纲缺一个字段，而「缺了」这件事本身无人发现。三个 PR 互不依赖，都基于
master只改SKILL.md。